“An American Werewolf in London”

MV5BNTYzMDk3MzIyNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTM2OTE4MzE@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_It’s not the Warren Zevon song. John Landis went for literal werewolves in his 1981 movie “An American Werewolf in London.”

When I stopped in a London movie theater, I luckily didn’t run into any werewolves myself, just this movie (it also wasn’t a porno theater). With several hit comedies under his belt, Landis moved on to horror, which could also be considered the dark side of comedy. Only, he really didn’t move on, as he stuck with all his comedic beats for “Werewolf,” which go for a lot of laughs to go along with the terror.

It’s a pretty standard horror setup really: Americans David (David Kessler) and Jack (Griffin Dunne) go backpacking in Europe, and they do some foolish things and get themselves attacked by a strange creature. Jack dies, and David (who just so happened to be played by the better actor) is spared, but is also left haunted by the prospect of turning into a werewolf himself and mauling the people around him.

Landis offers his own comedic touch to it, with Jack returning from the dead to check in on David numerous times, with mangled flesh (a lot of great makeup in this movie) and a grudge against David for getting him killed (he finds being dead to be a pretty dull experience). Jack, waking up in the hospital finds himself attended to by Pretty Nurse Alex (Jenny Agutter), who — it being the ’80s — almost instantly falls madly in love with him and decides to take him home with her. It makes you wonder if it’s common practice in the U.K. for nurses to take home their patients. Talk about your work following you home. Plain-looking dudes have it good in the movies — especially in the ’80s — with beautiful women constantly fawning at the very sight of them. In this case, Alex practically falls directly into David’s lap.

american-werewolf-london-4

The moral is don’t get killed by a werewolf.

The movie does a good job of playing up David’s creeping fears that he, in fact, was bitten by a werewolf — despite his doctor trying to convince him that it was an “escaped lunatic” who had attacked him — with the next realization naturally being that he will become a werewolf himself and attack and eat people.

David’s apparent lycanthropy is strongly played up as an allegory for mental illness or trauma. David is haunted by dreams of himself running through the woods naked and attacking a dear and a pack of werewolf Nazis invading his house and killing his family. The audience finds out David is Jewish, which Alex joked about, having seen the state of his penis, so it makes sense that he has a nightmare about Nazis. Once David has actually made the transformation to werewolf and gone on a deadly rampage, he fears it will happen again, but can come up with no way to stop himself from turning again. Jack’s ghost or apparition continues to  appear to David (in increasing states of decay each time), along with the other people David has killed. They all tell him he needs to kill himself to stop the bloodline of the werewolf and to prevent himself from killing more and risk spreading the disease onto some other poor unassuming soul. These are all variations on devices movies tend to use to denote mental illness.

An-American-werewolf-in-London-1981-movie-scene

Not just werewolves, not just Nazis, but werewolf Nazis.

Comparing a furry killing machine to a person with mental illness borders on demonizing the mentally ill. Fear and mistreatment of the mentally ill has long been a major failing in society, and especially in the U.S., and continues to be today, as mentally ill is the term the media and politicians continuously use to describe the perpetrators of tragic massacres, such as school shootings.

The cry from the U.S. government has consistently been that there needs to be better treatment of mental illness, even though no improvements are ever made, and the government usually responds by shrinking health coverage even more than it already has. Despite racism, misogyny, easy access to guns all being seemingly common factors in these types of attacks, mental illness and violent movies and video games are usually treated as the culprits.

Mental illness is a serious issue, as someone who suffers from it can be a danger to themselves, and sometimes to others, and it does need to be addressed for the sake of people who live with it. So, it’s good to see movies take on the issue, though it is a sensitive one.

But if you narrow the scope of “mental illness” to people who have a propensity for violent behavior (or sociopaths), then there is certainly an important conversation to be had.

Once undead Jack warns David that he’s going to turn into a werewolf, David’s main concern becomes that Jack’s prophetic message will come true and that he will transform and kill people. Despite David desperately not wanting that to happen, there is nothing he can do to stop it. David’s doctor eventually does come to the realization that David might indeed be correct in his worries, but he comes to that realization too late to do anything. When David does begin to seek help, people treat him as if he is “insane” (which would be debatable), but they don’t do anything to help him. He finds himself alone in his problem, left to his thoughts and his demons.

The eventual solution to David’s problem is that the police kill him. That’s trending a little too much toward a fascist solution for dealing with violent or even potentially violent people, and a solution police in the U.S. unfortunately seem to be taking more often. But it doesn’t seem as if Landis wanted his audience to be comfortable or satisfied with that grisly ending. The director basically offers up his worst-case scenario for the situation, in which everything goes as badly as it possibly can, and he leaves it up to the audience as to how things could be done differently.

cd553b1aca8fc0dc1007f4157a5bdb24

He looks like a good scratch behind the ears might calm him down. The actual werewolf might have looked good in 1981, but he has not aged particularly well.

Obviously, better access to mental health care would be a great step in the right direction, but that would cost the government (and taxpayers) money it isn’t willing to spend. Making access to deadly weapons more difficult would help (could you imagine a werewolf with a gun?), but the NRA has a stranglehold on the government in regard to that issue. How about taking steps to address virulent racism and misogyny propagated on the internet? A common response lately tends to be that the victims are actually the ones at fault (walk up, not out). There is a necessary conversation to be had here, but in truth, the conversations have been had, and ultimately, the people who have the power to improve things don’t want to … so things are the way they are.

The question the movie poses most prominently is in a similar vein to the question posed pertaining to the Joker in the “Dark Knight,” and that is: What do you do with a person who poses an uncompromising threat to others? It’s a little different in that the Joker has an impenetrable ideology predicated on perpetuating violence and chaos, but David is unable to control his propensity for violence. But the intent of the “violent person” really isn’t as important as coming up with a solution that both protects the people around them while still being respectful of their humanity. There was no end to the Joker’s scheming, so there really wasn’t a solution to that issue. There could have been a means to protect David from others, as well as himself because he had the desire to do what was right. But the societal pieces were not in place for him to be treated for his condition.

It’s a question that society has been plagued by since way before 1981. Of course, there is no be all, end all solution for what to do with violent people. But there are ways to curb violent behavior, like taking steps toward better mental health programs and gun control. Maybe none of those things would stop a werewolf, but luckily, werewolves don’t exist (that anyone knows of).

There’s probably something to be said about an American who travels to Europe and winds up terrorizing a city. Maybe it’s intended to be a darkly humorous take on Americans’ propensity to take advantage of other people wherever they go, or possibly just taking the annoyance of tourists to a new, ridiculous level. Perhaps it’s a mildly exaggerated recounting of some of Landis’ own personal experiences, since he wrote the movie along with directing it.

This wasn’t the first comedic horror movie, but the subgenre has really taken off since then, offering up many great entries, like Edgar Wright’s Cornetto Trilogy, and “Shaun of the Dead” in particular, which billed itself as a “Romantic comedy. With zombies,” and also the best picture nominated “Get Out,” which took blurring the line between comedy and horror to a new level.

But in the end, “An American Werewolf in London” makes for a fun and frightful freak show that doesn’t require any deep thinking to enjoy. You folks back in 2018 would do fine to give it a look.

I’m going to continue my globe trotting, next looking at “Raiders of the Lost Ark.” That one’s pretty popular from what I remember. On my way, I’ll make sure to stay on the road, keep clear of the moors. Oh shit, the moon is full! I’d better get going…

“Diva” (1981)

MV5BNjRjOGNlMjYtZDVmOC00ODZlLWE3MDAtNzM2NmZjY2YwNDQ0XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjQzMzQzODY@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,696,1000_AL_When the author of this piece made his stop in France, he stumbled into a small theater, whereupon, ooh la la, he happened to catch an early new wave gangster film called “Diva.” Directed by Jean-Jacques Beineix, “Diva” is pretty unique for the subgenre, following a young French postman as he tries to escape from the gangsters who are after him, looking for an incriminating tape that unfortuitously falls into his possession.

Jules (Frederic Andrei) is a pretty unassuming guy, though he’s hardly “normal.” The man lives in a garage that doesn’t even have a door on its entrance and is filled with wrecked classic cars and his own audiophile equipment. You see, he has a healthy appreciation for music — opera in particular — along with a rather unhealthy appreciation for American virtuoso, Cynthia Hawkins (Wilhemenia Fernandez),  more specifically. In addition to getting himself into trouble with a pair of unsavory looking guys who are after a tape that happens to fall into his mail carrier on his moped, he also gets himself into a bit of trouble with a recording he made of Cynthia singing at one of her concerts. That’s a big deal because Cynthia is solely a performing artist, who doesn’t do recordings. That makes a tape of her performance a sought after item due to her status and her incredible voice. There happens to be a couple Taiwanese mafia members looking to get their hands on that tape so they can cash in on it.

It turns out the police are also looking for the gangster tape as Commissaire Jean Saporta (Jacques Fabbri) believes it may be the key to cracking an international prostitution ring that happens to operate in Paris. He puts a pair of his best cops on the case, and they set out to track down Jules.

Jules also happens upon a young Vietnamese lady, named Alba (Thuy An Luu) thieving records from a local music store, and they quickly become friends for some reason. Alba also lives with a purportedly wealthy benefactor, Mr. Gorodish (Richard Bohringer), though their relationship is never concretely defined. Alba and Gorodish take a liking to Jules. Luu has the standout performance in the movie as the sassy, intelligent Alba. There are a lot of pairs of characters in this movie, who are concerned with Jules, to go along with the pair of tapes he has in his possession.

MV5BMjMyMDMwNjE5MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMzQ4MTg3NTE@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,1466,1000_AL_

Who even knows what’s going on with Alba and Godorish?

If it isn’t clear, the Euro quirk is strong with this one. This is a quite odd little movie here, and no amount of description can truly capture the quirkiness this film exudes. There are lots of little goofy things from one of the gangsters’ apparent vocal dislike of just about everything, as well as his fondness of murdering people with his signature ice pick, to the weird aquatic motif Alba and Gorodish have, which goes unremarked upon in their dimly lit apartment.

Beineix has set his movie in Paris, but shies away from the city’s abundant majesty most movies set there are lavished with, opting instead to have his characters reside in places like Jules’ strange garage abode or Gorodish’s warehouse home or tiny residences that are tucked away in the corners of alleys in the city. It feels like Beineix may have been trying to portray the more common side of Paris that generally goes unnoticed by the world, at least in the movies.

The structure of the movie is strange too, as Beineix has basically mashed together two completely separate stories, each of which probably could have been its  own movie, and perhaps they were intended to be, only he didn’t have enough material to make a complete feature of either. The only connecting factor between the story of the titular diva and the gangster tale, is Jules, who plays a central role in each. Maybe there’s some novelty in that each story involves a taped recording, both of which are in Jules’ possession, which the characters in each section are after. The crime story is fun and thrilling, while the thing with the opera singer is an exploration of the issues surrounding pirating of what today is called intellectual property. The separation of the two stories makes for an awkward viewing, especially as the gangsters are really more interesting than Jules’ relationship with Cynthia, and the diva kind of disrupts the momentum of the other story.

Both stories do appear to take on anti-authoritarian undertones, which likely will be a common theme in this exploration of movies from the ’80s (the time in which the writer of this piece, and those forthcoming, happens to find himself).

An anti-police and generally anti-government undercurrent runs through the gangster tale. The two gangsters looking for Jules pose as undercover police, blurring the lines between lawless criminals and the supposedly good cops. The actual cops seem to be well-meaning, yet very inept at their jobs, not particularly succeeding in anything they attempt to do. But as Jules goes on the run, both the fake cops and the real cops are looking for him. Jules stops to spend one night at the house of a couple he knows. The next morning, the woman calls the house to let Jules know one of the pairs of cops was asking for him (though it’s uncertain which set of “cops” that would be), and that they look like fascists. But Jules, and the audience, do eventually discover that the scheme the gangsters are involved in does indeed go all the way to the very top. It seems very intentional that the director is trying to lump the cops in with the crooks. Sure there are good cops, but they don’t do enough to make up for the harm the police department does, at least in this movie. People around the world know that police are bad news, it’s really only folks in the U.S. who seem to hold “Blue” in high regard.

MV5BMTYzNjc2MjY0Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTU4MTg3NTE@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,1496,1000_AL_

They look like fascists

In Cynthia’s story, there is a lot of conversation surrounding music pirating, as music journalists ask her thoughts on recording. She isn’t against recording or making money with music, she just has personal reasons for not doing so herself. She really hates pirating, however, believing it to be basically the same as rape. Even though Jules has his own private recording of Cynthia’s performance, he only keeps it for his own enjoyment, and has no interest in selling it or distributing it in any way. But there is the ethical question of whether he should have the right to have a recording of Cynthia, when it would be expressly against her wishes if she did know about it. It does weigh the conundrum of how important an artist’s compensation for their work is, compared to the distribution and propagation of that work and who has the right to enjoy it.

Things take a creepier turn regarding Jules’ relationship with Cynthia. Jules has stolen a dress, which he saw Cynthia perform in, which he makes a prostitute put on before having sex with her. Then, he uses his status as a courier to personally deliver a bouquet of flowers to her hotel room in order to introduce himself to her and return the dress, letting her know he stole it, and that he had traveled around Europe to see her perform numerous times, as far away as Munich, which he had ridden to on his moped. Cynthia is understandably weirded out by all of this information and nearly calls the police. But she eventually sees that Jules is harmless, takes a fascination to his obsession with her, and even agrees to go on a date with him. That’s far beyond the best outcome Jules should have expected as he was carrying out his plan.

Because everything that Jules did to get himself into contact with Cynthia would be stalking and the epitome of male entitlement. In the modern day, “Diva,” isn’t exactly a well-known film, but this is the sort of story that might be encouraging to stalkers, and there are a lot of popular films that also promote men’s beliefs of their entitlement to women. Jules is a harmless person, but he is a character in a movie. In real life, stalkers — especially those who stalk celebrities — which seem to be in the news more and more, sometimes turn out to be very violent people. Look at Taylor Swift’s stalker, for instance. Society is now at a point where “incel” is a word that’s in the public lexicon, and it’s hard to ignore that popular movies have played a role in promoting the idea that men “deserve” women rather than promoting healthy views of relationships, boundaries, and how to deal with rejection. Movies aren’t the only source of influence in this area, but they are a major part of pop culture, and they can hold a lot of suggestive power. Jules’ behavior shouldn’t be seen as fun and quirky, nor as romantic, even though in the end, he “gets the girl.” It should be recognized for the harmful ideas it seems to suggest are OK. Unhealthy masculinity will probably be a running theme for the ’80s.

On the flip side, as Cynthia and Jules do enter a relationship together, the movie should get some points for having a successful woman be able to turn the tables and take agency in choosing the relationship for herself. Cynthia is not in any way a manic pixie dream girl, as she has her own career and her own life, not necessarily looking for any relationship. She is the dominant partner in the relationship, being the one with money and fame and Jules just being an ordinary guy. It is refreshing to see the woman be successful and choose to have a less successful partner. Jules is almost treated as a pet, as he doesn’t sleep in the bed, and when they go out, Jules holds the parasol for her. But he’s happy in his role, which he also freely chooses, because he gets to be with the woman he loves. Some of the horrible aspects of this relationship aside, the two actually make a pretty healthy couple. It’s definitely a European film thing; you really don’t often see stuff like this in American movies very often.

Speaking of American movies, you also don’t often get to see people of color in strong roles, especially women of color, and especially in the ’80s. Cynthia and Alba are both very enjoyable characters. Cynthia is obviously pretty well fleshed out. Glimpses of Alba’s character are offered, but the bit of mystery makes her more interesting. She’s interesting enough that a spin-off movie about her character would not be unwelcome. But take note, angry “Star Wars” fans of the 2010s, every aspect of a character does not need to be elaborated upon in order to make them interesting and effective in a movie. Not even Asian characters. Alba and Rose FTW.

“Diva” seems to have been largely influential for stylish gangster films with ensemble casts.  “The Godfather” came earlier, of course, but the quirkiness of this movie shook down the stuffy old guys in suits and served up something young and hip instead, something fresh for a new decade. Quentin Tarantino may owe his entire career to this movie (what was Samuel L. Jackson’s name in “Pulp Fiction”?), and fans of “Snatch” and even “Ocean’s Eleven” (even though it’s a remake) probably ought to be thankful for “Diva’s” influence.

So, my friends back in 2018 where I left you all, although “Diva” might have been better served as two separate movies, it’s worth checking out for anyone in the mood for a fun crime thriller.

MV5BMTg1ODcwOTc3NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjg4MTg3NTE@._V1_SX1431_CR0,0,1431,999_AL_

Strange couple. Strange movie.

Next time, I’ll continue my reporting on my early-’80s Eurotrip from the U.K. (though it’s actually an American movie) with “An American Werewolf in London.”

Where I’m going, I won’t need roads

Are you ready? Are you ready for the ’80s, a time when the things were even stranger? Are you ready player done with fake-ass nostalgia? I hit 88 miles per hour in my car, and I’ve found that I’ve landed in 1981. Everyone has weird hair and funky clothes, which are probably considered chic. The president used to be an actor.

Since I’m here, I may as well do what I always do, and that’s check out some movies. I’ll continue to offer commentary on historic movies (and probably ruin them for you) and advocate for foreign films like I always do, but with more hot pink.

Hasta la vista, baby.